These principles are increasingly articulated through the IOC’s Agenda 2020+5, a strategic roadmap that places sustainability and climate action at its core. The agenda mandates that all future Olympic Games be climate-positive by 2030, meaning they must remove more carbon from the atmosphere than they emit. This ambitious goal necessitates a fundamental re-evaluation of how the Games are bid for, planned, and executed. For winter sports, the challenge is particularly acute. Rising global temperatures directly threaten the viability of traditional winter sports venues, leading to shorter seasons, unreliable natural snow, and an increased reliance on energy-intensive artificial snow production. This shrinking pool of potential host cities makes the imperative for climate action not just an ethical one, but a matter of existential importance for the Winter Olympics itself.
One significant area where the IOC is actively striving to make the Olympics more sustainable is by adopting a model where Games take place over a wider geographical area, primarily utilizing pre-existing facilities. Coventry pointed to Milan-Cortina 2026 as an "acid test" for whether this distributed, multi-venue approach is a viable and truly sustainable future for the Games. The Milan-Cortina Games, set against the stunning backdrop of northern Italy, exemplify this new philosophy by being spread across three main hubs: Milan, Cortina d’Ampezzo, and Livigno. Beyond these, events are also slated for venues in Val di Fiemme for Nordic skiing and ski jumping, and the opening ceremony is planned for the iconic Verona Arena, further illustrating the extensive geographical spread. This strategy is designed to minimize new construction, thereby reducing environmental impact, avoiding "white elephant" venues, and potentially lowering overall costs. For Milan-Cortina, this translates into a scenario where only two newly built sporting facilities are planned: the Santagiulia ice hockey arena in Milan and the Cortina Sliding Centre for bobsleigh, luge, and skeleton. The decision to build a new sliding center in Cortina, specifically, has been a contentious point, given existing facilities elsewhere in Europe that could have been repurposed. Critics argue that building a new, specialized, and expensive track runs counter to the very sustainability principles the IOC champions, raising questions about the true commitment to avoiding new construction when high-cost, high-impact projects are still deemed necessary.
The distributed venue model is not a one-off experiment. The next two Winter Olympics, French Alps 2030 and Utah 2034, are also committed to spreading sports across wider areas, primarily leveraging existing infrastructure. The French Alps bid, for instance, proposes using venues across four distinct clusters in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes and Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur regions. Similarly, Utah’s bid for 2034 heavily relies on the legacy venues from the successful Salt Lake City 2002 Winter Olympics. This strategy extends to the Summer Games as well, with the 2032 Summer Olympics in Brisbane planning to utilize venues across the entire state of Queensland, rather than concentrating all activities within a single metropolitan area.
However, this innovative approach, while laudable in its sustainability goals, has not been without its challenges. The spread-out nature of these Games has already caused significant logistical and financial issues, most notably highlighted by the Brisbane 2032 organizers. Despite the initial commitment to a budget of $4.9 billion (approximately £3.6 billion at the time), organizers have openly stated that they will exceed this figure, necessitating a fresh budget overhaul. The reasons for this overrun are multifaceted, extending beyond just the widespread venues to include rising construction costs, inflation, the complexity of developing and upgrading transport infrastructure across a larger area, and enhanced security requirements for multiple sites. The costs associated with accommodating athletes and support staff in various villages, rather than a single central hub, also add to the financial burden.
Coventry acknowledged these complexities, stating, "We are really experiencing a spread out Games here for the first time – we are going to learn a lot." She elaborated on the core dilemma: "We have taken this decision for sustainability reasons, climate and not having to have new venues. We are seeing there is an impact on National Olympic Committees because of the spreadness [sic], also for broadcast and media, making it harder to get around." The impact on National Olympic Committees (NOCs) is substantial. Managing teams, equipment, and support staff across disparate locations increases logistical headaches and operational costs for individual countries. Athletes might find themselves traveling more frequently, potentially impacting their training routines and sense of camaraderie that traditionally forms in a singular Olympic Village.
For broadcasters and media, the challenges are equally pronounced. Covering events simultaneously across multiple, distant venues requires significantly more personnel, equipment, and travel, escalating operational costs and making comprehensive coverage more difficult. Journalists face increased travel times and the logistical nightmare of navigating different transportation networks, potentially fragmenting the media narrative and making it harder for the public to follow the Games as a cohesive whole. The audience experience, too, could be affected, with a potentially less concentrated atmosphere and a reduced sense of a unified Olympic spectacle.
Despite these hurdles, Coventry also highlighted the undeniable appeal of the distributed model. "What is really cool is that you get to see iconic venues in beautiful places – but now we have to weigh this up, the balance between a spread games for sustainability reasons but not shifting complexity and sustainability to different areas." The opportunity to showcase diverse, iconic locations like the Dolomites in Cortina or the historical grandeur of Verona adds a unique charm and broader geographical engagement to the Games. It allows more local communities to feel directly involved, potentially fostering a deeper and more widespread legacy. However, the critical question remains: is the IOC truly solving the sustainability challenge, or merely redistributing its complexities and financial burdens? If increased travel for NOCs, media, and spectators, coupled with the need for extensive inter-venue transport infrastructure, negates the environmental benefits of avoiding new builds, then the overall sustainability gains might be minimal, or even negative. The phrase "not shifting complexity and sustainability to different areas" suggests an awareness that the onus must remain on the central organizing bodies to ensure that the burden of a spread-out model doesn’t simply get offloaded onto other stakeholders or inadvertently increase the overall carbon footprint through extensive travel.
While these strategic discussions and logistical preparations continue, the action for the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milan-Cortina symbolically got underway on Wednesday with the commencement of curling events, a common practice for some sports to begin before the official opening. The Games will officially commence with the highly anticipated opening ceremony on Friday. Beyond the athletic competition, Coventry also expressed a profound hope for the spirit of the Games, particularly regarding how all participating nations and their athletes would be treated by spectators. Her comments were especially pertinent given recent criticisms from Italian authorities concerning the presence of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in Milan. Italian officials expressed concerns about the unilateral deployment of foreign law enforcement personnel, viewing it as a potential infringement on national sovereignty and a deviation from standard security protocols which typically involve close cooperation with local authorities. This diplomatic friction underscores the delicate balance required to host an international event of this magnitude.
"I hope the opening ceremony is seen by everyone as a chance to be respectful," Coventry stated, subtly referencing the need for a harmonious environment amidst such controversies. She drew upon the essence of the Olympic spirit, adding, "For me, when we went to the Olympic village that is the best reminder of how the Games should be. I hope the opening ceremony will do that." The Olympic Village traditionally symbolizes a sanctuary of unity, mutual respect, and shared humanity, where athletes from diverse backgrounds coexist peacefully, transcending political and national differences. Coventry’s appeal for respect is a call to uphold this fundamental Olympic ideal, ensuring that all participants, including the U.S. team, feel welcome and safe, and that any off-field disputes do not overshadow the spirit of athletic competition and global fellowship.
In conclusion, Kirsty Coventry’s assertion that the IOC "must be better" on climate change encapsulates the defining challenge for the future of the Winter Olympics. The Milan-Cortina 2026 Games represent a crucial testing ground for the IOC’s distributed venue strategy, a bold attempt to balance environmental responsibility with the practicalities of hosting a mega-event. While this approach offers significant sustainability benefits by reducing new construction and showcasing diverse regions, it introduces complex logistical and financial hurdles for organizing committees, National Olympic Committees, and media alike. The critical task for the IOC and future host cities will be to rigorously evaluate whether the environmental gains outweigh these new complexities, ensuring that the burden of sustainability is not merely shifted but genuinely addressed. As the world watches the Milan-Cortina Games unfold, the lessons learned from this "acid test" will undoubtedly shape the trajectory of the Olympic movement for decades to come, particularly as it strives to preserve winter sports in an increasingly warming world, while upholding the timeless values of respect and unity.








